Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
xaila:start [2019/12/11 08:51] – [XAILA 2019 at Jurix 2019] schedule gjn | xaila:start [2021/04/26 09:32] – xaila 2021 at icail gjn | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== The EXplainable AI in Law (XAILA) Workshop ====== | + | ====== The EXplainable |
- | **XAILA webpage [[http:// | + | **The main XAILA webpage |
- | [[start2018|The first edition, XAILA2018]] was | + | XAILA is an interdisciplinary workshop on the intersection of AI and Law, focusing on the important issues of EXplainable and Responsible AI. |
- | **Organized by:** Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz, | + | |
- | at the [[http:// | + | |
- | [[start2018|See | + | |
- | We also proposed | + | In 2021 we are planning next editions of XAILA. |
- | [[icail2019|See the dedicated page for XAILA2019@ICAIL]] | + | |
- | **The second edition of XAILA** is Organized by: Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz, | + | See more information on the [[start#past editions of XAILA]]. |
- | at the [[https:// | + | |
- | December 11, 2019, Madrid, Spain in ETSI Minas y Energía School (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid) | + | |
- | ===== XAILA 2019 at Jurix 2019 ===== | + | ===== XAILA 2021 at ICAIL2021 |
- | ==== Workshop | + | The 4th International |
+ | at the [[https:// | ||
- | Location: **The next building after registration, | + | The idea of the XAILA series of JURIX workshops (1st edition XAILA 2018 in Groningen, 2nd edition XAILA 2019 in Madrid, 3rd edition XAILA 2020 in Brno (online)) is to provide an interdisciplinary platform for the discussion of ideas with respect to explainable AI, algorithmic transparency, |
- | 9:30- 9:40 XAILA Chairs - Workshop Opening\\ | + | ==== Organizing Commitee ==== |
- | 9:40-10:10 Francesco Sovrano, Fabio Vitali and Monica Palmirani: //The difference between Explainable and Explaining: requirements and challenges under the GDPR//\\ | + | Michał Araszkiewicz, |
- | 10: | + | Martin Atzmueller, University in Osnabrück, Germany\\ |
- | 10:35-11:00 Break\\ | + | Grzegorz J. Nalepa, |
+ | Bart Verheij, University in Groningen, the Netherlands\\ | ||
- | 11:00-11:44 //Invited talk:// María Jesús González-Espejo, [[https:// | + | ==== Call for Papers ==== |
- | 11:44-12:10 Oana Ichim: // | + | {{ :xaila:xaila2021icail-cfp1.pdf |}} |
- | 12:10-12:35 Ramon Ruiz-Dolz, José Alemany, Stella Heras and Ana Garcia-Fornes: | + | |
- | 12:35-13 00 Michal Klincewicz and Lily Frank: //Emerging ethical and legal issues in healthcare machine learning// | + | |
- | 13:00 | + | |
+ | ==== Description ==== | ||
+ | In the last several years we have observed a growing interest in advanced AI systems achieving impressive task performance. However, there has also been an increased awareness of their complexity and challenging consequences of their possibly limited understandability to humans. In response, a number of research directions have been initiated. These include humanized or human-centered AI, as well as ethically aligned, ethically designed, or just ethical AI. For many of these ideas, the principal concept seems to be the explanatory capability of the AI system (XAI), e.g. via interpretable and explainable machine learning, inclusion of human background knowledge and adequate declarative knowledge, that could provide foundations not only for transparency and understandability, | ||
- | ==== Organizers ==== | + | Recently, the term responsible AI (RAI) has been coined as a step beyond XAI. Discussion of RAI has been again strongly influenced by the “ethical” perspective. However, as practitioners in our fields we are convinced that the advancements of AI are way too fast, and the ethical perspective much too vague to offer conclusive and constructive results. We are convinced that the concepts of responsibility, and accountability should be considered primarily from the legal perspective, |
- | Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz, Paulo Novais | + | |
- | ==== Abstract | + | ==== Topics of interest |
- | Humanized | + | Our objective is to bring people from AI interested |
+ | * the notions of transparency, interpretability and explainability | ||
+ | * non-functional design choices | ||
+ | * legal consequences of black-box AI systems | ||
+ | * legal criteria and requirements for explainable, | ||
+ | * criteria of legal responsibility discussed in the context of intelligent systems operation and the role of explainability in liability ascription | ||
+ | * possible applications of XAI systems in the area of legal policy deliberation, | ||
+ | * legal implications of the use of AI systems in different spheres of societal life | ||
+ | * the notion of right to explanation | ||
+ | * relation of XAI and RAI to argumentation technologies | ||
+ | * approaches and architectures | ||
+ | * XAI, RAI and declarative domain knowledge | ||
+ | * risk-based approach | ||
+ | * incorporation of ethical values into AI systems, its legal interpretation and consequences | ||
+ | * XAI, privacy and data protection (conceptual and theoretical issues) | ||
+ | * XAI, certification and compliance | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Important dates ==== | ||
+ | Submission: | ||
+ | Notification: | ||
+ | Camera-ready: | ||
+ | Workshop: 21.06.2021\\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Submission details ==== | ||
+ | We accept regular/ | ||
+ | A dedicated Easychair installation is provided at [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Program Committee (tbe & tbc) ==== | ||
+ | Martin Atzmüller, Osnabrück University, Germany\\ | ||
+ | Michał Araszkiewicz, | ||
+ | Kevin Ashley, University of Pittsburgh, USA\\ | ||
+ | Floris Bex, Utrecht University, the Netherlands\\ | ||
+ | Szymon Bobek, Jagiellonian University, Poland\\ | ||
+ | Jörg Cassens, University of Hildesheim, Germany\\ | ||
+ | David Camacho, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain\\ | ||
+ | Pompeu Casanovas, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain\\ | ||
+ | Enrico Francesconi, | ||
+ | Paulo Novais, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\ | ||
+ | Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Jagiellonian University, Poland\\ | ||
+ | Tiago Oliveira, National Institute of Informatics, | ||
+ | Martijn von Otterlo, Tilburg University, | ||
+ | Adrian Paschke, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany\\ | ||
+ | Juan Pavón, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain\\ | ||
+ | Monica Palmirani, Università di Bologna, Italy\\ | ||
+ | Radim Polčák, Masaryk University, Czech Republic\\ | ||
+ | Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel, | ||
+ | Ken Satoh, National Institute | ||
+ | Jaromír Šavelka, Carnegie Mellon University, USA\\ | ||
+ | Erich Schweighofer, | ||
+ | Michal Valco, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Slovakia\\ | ||
+ | Bart Verheij, University of Groningen, The Netherlands\\ | ||
+ | Tomasz Żurek, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University of Lublin, Poland\\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Invited Speakers ==== | ||
+ | We are delighted that two excellent keynote speakers accepted our invitation to present their lectures at XAILA2011@ICAIL. They are: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Prof. Katie Atkinson** | ||
+ | |||
+ | Title: The Landscape and Challenges for Explainability in AI and Law | ||
+ | |||
+ | Bio: Katie Atkinson is Professor of Computer Science | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Prof. Wojciech Wiewiórowski, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Bio: Adjunct professor in the Faculty of Law and Administration of the University of Gdańsk. He was among others adviser in the field of e-government and information society | ||
+ | The Inspector General for the Protection of Personal Data (Polish Data Protection Commissioner) 2010-2014 and the Vice Chair of the Working Party Art. 29 in 2014. In December 2014, he was appointed Assistant European Data Protection Supervisor. After the death of the Supervisor - Giovanni Buttarelli in August 2019 - he replaced Mr. Buttarelli as acting EDPS. | ||
+ | His areas of scientific activity include first of all Polish and European IT law, processing and security of information, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== XAILA 2020 at JURIX2020 ===== | ||
+ | ==== Workshop Program ==== | ||
+ | The workshop will take place on 09.12.2020 online using MSTeams. | ||
+ | More details will follow. | ||
+ | |||
+ | 9:15-9:30 Workshop Opening by the XAILA2020 Chairs (Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Michał Araszkiewicz, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Session 1 | ||
+ | |||
+ | 9: | ||
+ | Barbara Gallina, Görkem Pacaci, David Johnson, Steve McKeever, Andreas Hamfelt, Stefania Costantini, Pierangelo Dell' | ||
+ | |||
+ | 10: | ||
+ | Youssef Ennali and Tom van Engers: | ||
+ | Data-driven | ||
+ | |||
+ | 10:30-11:00 coffee break | ||
+ | |||
+ | Session 2 | ||
+ | |||
+ | 11:00-12:00 INVITED TALK Philipp Hacker - AI and Discrimination: | ||
+ | |||
+ | 12: | ||
+ | Heng Zheng, Davide Grossi and Bart Verheij: | ||
+ | Precedent Comparison in the Precedent Model Formalism: Theory and Application to Legal Cases | ||
+ | |||
+ | 12: | ||
+ | Bernardo Alkmim, Edward Hermann Haeusler and Daniel Schwabe: | ||
+ | Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs in an Intuitionistic Description Logic | ||
+ | |||
+ | 13:00-14:00 lunch break | ||
+ | |||
+ | Session 3 | ||
+ | |||
+ | 14:00-15:00 INVITED TALK Reinoud Baker - Legal information | ||
+ | |||
+ | 15: | ||
+ | Annemarie Borg and Floris Bex: | ||
+ | Explaining Arguments at the Dutch National Police | ||
+ | |||
+ | 15:30-16:00 coffee break | ||
+ | |||
+ | Session 4 and Roundtable discussion | ||
+ | |||
+ | 16: | ||
+ | Łukasz Górski, Shashishekar Ramakrishna and Jędrzej M. Nowosielski: | ||
+ | |||
+ | 16: | ||
+ | Giovanni Sileno, Alexander Boer, Geoff Gordon and Bernhard Reader: Like Circles in the Water: Responsibility as a System-Level Function | ||
+ | |||
+ | 17: | ||
+ | Karl Branting: Explanation in Hybrid, Two-Stage Models | ||
+ | |||
+ | 17:30-18:15 Roundtable discussion | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Invited Speakers ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | **Professor Dr. Philipp Hacker**, LL.M. (Yale), holds the Chair for Law and Ethics of the Digital Society at European University Viadrina in Frankfurt (Oder). He serves jointly at the Faculty of Law and at the European New School of Digital Studies (ENS). Before joining Viadrina, he was an AXA Postdoctoral Fellow at the Faculty of Law at Humboldt University of Berlin. Previous research stays include a Max Weber Fellowship at the European University Institute and an A.SK Fellowship at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center. His research focuses on law and technology as well as (behavioral) law and economics. In 2020, he received the Science Award of the German Foundation for Law and Computer Science. His most recent books include Regulating Blockchain. Techno-Social and Legal Challenges (Oxford University Press, 2019, co-edited with Ioannis Lianos, Georgios Dimitropoulos and Stefan Eich); Theories of Choice. The Social Science and the Law of Decision Making (Oxford University Press, forthcoming, | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Title of the talk** AI and Discrimination: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Abstract** | ||
+ | The talk will focus on the interaction between AI models and liability in the domain of non-discrimination. As is well-known, the output of AI models may exhibit bias toward legally protected groups. In the past, various fairness definitions have been developed | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | **Reinoud Baker** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Title** Legal information systems in production | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Abstract** | ||
+ | LexIQ is a Dutch legal tech startup using data science for legal information services. We have the vision that legal tech can serve citizens, governments and businesses, for instance by improved access to justice, efficient use of resources and enhanced compliance. This talk will address what we have learned in the past 4 years. What can be achieved | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Call for Papers ==== | ||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Motivation for the workshop ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the last several years we have observed a growing interest in advanced AI systems achieving impressive task performance. However, there has also been an increased awareness of their complexity and challenging consequences of their possibly limited understandability to humans. In response, a number of research directions have been initiated. These include humanized or human-centered AI, as well as ethically aligned, ethically designed, or just ethical AI. In many of these ideas, the principal concept seems to be the explanatory capability of the AI system (XAI), e.g. via interpretable and explainable machine learning, inclusion of human background knowledge and adequate declarative knowledge, that could provide foundations not only for transparency and understandability, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Recently, the term responsible AI (RAI) has been coined as a step beyond XAI. Discussion of RAI has been again strongly influenced by the “ethical” perspective. However, as practitioners in our fields we are convinced, that the advancements of AI are way too fast, and the ethical perspective much too vague to offer conclusive and constructive results. We are convinced, that the concepts of responsibility, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Topics of interest ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Our objective | ||
- | ==== Motivation for the workshop and description ==== | ||
- | Humanized AI (HAI) includes important perspectives in AI systems, including transparency and explainability (XAI). Another one is the affective computing paradigm. These perspectives have an important ethical dimension. While ethical discussion is conducted by many philosophers, | ||
- | We believe, that it is the intersection of Law and AI that makes such an endeavor possible. Together, this lays foundations and provides a conceptual framework for ethical concepts and values in AI systems. Therefore, when discussing ethical consequences and considerations of transparent and explainable AI systems, including affective systems, we should focus on the legal conceptual framework. A significant part of AI and Law research during the last two decades was devoted to operationalization of legal thinking with values. These results may now be reconsidered in a broader context, concerning the development of XAI systems and their social impact. As such it is a very timely issue for the AI and Law community. | ||
- | Our objective is to bring people from AI interested in XAI/HAI topics (possibly with broader background than just engineering) and create an ample space for discussion with people from the field of legal scholarship and/or legal practice. As many members of the AI and Law community join both perspectives, | ||
* the notions of transparency, | * the notions of transparency, | ||
* non-functional design choices for explainable and transparent AI systems | * non-functional design choices for explainable and transparent AI systems | ||
* legal consequences of black-box AI systems | * legal consequences of black-box AI systems | ||
- | * legal criteria and requirements for explainable | + | * legal criteria and requirements for explainable, transparent, and responsible |
+ | * criteria of legal responsibility discussed in the context of intelligent systems operation and the role of explainability in liability ascription | ||
* possible applications of XAI systems in the area of legal policy deliberation, | * possible applications of XAI systems in the area of legal policy deliberation, | ||
- | * ethical and legal implications of the use of AI systems in different spheres of societal life | + | * legal implications of the use of AI systems in different spheres of societal life |
* the notion of right to explanation | * the notion of right to explanation | ||
- | * relation of XAI and argumentation technologies | + | * relation of XAI and RAI to argumentation technologies |
- | * XAI models, | + | * approaches and architectures |
- | * XAI and declarative domain knowledge | + | * XAI, RAI and declarative domain knowledge |
* risk-based approach to analysis of AI systems and the influence of XAI on risk assessment | * risk-based approach to analysis of AI systems and the influence of XAI on risk assessment | ||
- | * incorporation of ethical values into AI systems | + | * incorporation of ethical values into AI systems, its legal interpretation and consequences |
- | * XAI, privacy and data protection | + | * XAI, privacy and data protection |
- | * possible legal aspects | + | |
* XAI, certification and compliance | * XAI, certification and compliance | ||
- | ==== List of members of the program committee (tentative) | + | ==== Workshop format |
+ | Workshop format: paper presentations + panel discussion, invited talk/s. | ||
- | Martin Atzmueller, | + | Intended audience are practitioners and theorists from both law and AI. |
+ | |||
+ | ==== Program Committee ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | List of members of the program committee (to be confirmed): | ||
+ | Martin Atzmueller, | ||
Michal Araszkiewicz, | Michal Araszkiewicz, | ||
Kevin Ashley, University of Pittsburgh, USA\\ | Kevin Ashley, University of Pittsburgh, USA\\ | ||
Line 74: | Line 224: | ||
Adrian Paschke, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany\\ | Adrian Paschke, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany\\ | ||
Monica Palmirani, Università di Bologna, Italy\\ | Monica Palmirani, Università di Bologna, Italy\\ | ||
- | Juan Pavón Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain\\ | ||
Radim Polčák, Masaryk University, Czech Republic\\ | Radim Polčák, Masaryk University, Czech Republic\\ | ||
Marie Postma, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ | Marie Postma, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ | ||
Ken Satoh, National Institute of Informatics, | Ken Satoh, National Institute of Informatics, | ||
+ | Jaromír Šavelka, Carnegie Mellon University, USA\\ | ||
Erich Schweighofer, | Erich Schweighofer, | ||
Michal Valco, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Slovakia\\ | Michal Valco, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Slovakia\\ | ||
- | Tomasz Żurek, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University of Lublin, Poland | + | Tomasz Żurek, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University of Lublin, Poland\\ |
==== Important dates ==== | ==== Important dates ==== | ||
- | Submission: 25.11.2019\\ | ||
- | Notification: | ||
- | Corrected papers: 06.12.2019\\ | ||
- | Workshop: | ||
- | ====Submission | + | Submission: // |
- | Please submit | + | Notification: |
- | [[https:// | + | Camera-ready: |
- | We are accepting short papers – 5 pages with references, and long papers – 10 pages. We are encouraging both original research papers, as well position papers. | + | Workshop: |
- | All submissions should be formatted using the styles | + | |
- | Workshop proceedings will be made available | + | ==== Submission |
- | A post workshop journal publication is considered. | + | |
+ | We accept regular/ | ||
+ | We also welcome short and position papers of 6pp. | ||
+ | Please use the [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | A dedicated Easychair installation | ||
+ | |||
+ | Workshop proceedings will be made available by CEUR-WS. A post workshop journal publication is considered. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Past editions of XAILA ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[start2018|The first edition, XAILA2018]] was | ||
+ | Organized by: Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz, | ||
+ | at the [[http:// | ||
+ | [[start2018|See | ||
+ | |||
+ | XAILA 2018 proceedings can be found at [[http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-2381]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | We also proposed XAILA to be held on the [[https://icail2019-cyberjustice.com|International Conference on Artificial Intelligence | ||
+ | [[icail2019|See the dedicated page for XAILA2019@ICAIL]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[start2019|The second edition of XAILA, XAILA2019]] was Organized | ||
+ | at the [[https:// | ||
+ | December 11, 2019, Madrid, Spain in ETSI Minas y Energía School (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid) | ||
+ | [[start2019|See the dedicated page for XAILA2019]] | ||
+ | XAILA 2019 proceedings can be found at [[http:// | ||