Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
xaila:start [2019/03/23 17:13] – [List of members of the program committee] gjn | xaila:start [2020/12/08 14:48] – [Invited Speakers] gjn | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== The EXplainable AI in Law (XAILA) Workshop ====== | + | ====== The EXplainable |
- | **XAILA webpage [[http:// | + | **The main XAILA webpage |
- | **The second edition of XAILA** will be held on the [[https:// | + | XAILA is an interdisciplinary workshop |
- | **Organized | + | In 2020 we are having the 3rd edition of XAILA, organized |
+ | (Jagiellonian University, Poland; University of Groningen, The Netherlands; | ||
+ | JURIX 2020 is the 33rd International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems organised by the Foundation for Legal Knowledge Based Systems (JURIX) since 1988. JURIX 2020 is co-hosted by the Institue of Law and Technology (Faculty of Law, Masaryk University, Brno) and the Knowledge-based Software Systems Group (Department of Computer Science, Faculty of Electrical Engineering, | ||
- | [[start2018|The first edition, XAILA2018]] was | + | See more information on the [[start#past editions of XAILA]]. |
- | **Organized by:** Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz, | + | |
- | at the [[http:// | + | |
- | [[start2018|See the dedicated page for XAILA2018]] | + | |
- | ===== XAILA2019@ICAIL | + | ===== XAILA 2020 at JURIX2020 |
+ | ==== Workshop Program ==== | ||
+ | The workshop will take place on 09.12.2020 online using MSTeams. | ||
+ | More details will follow. | ||
- | The 2nd EXplainable AI in Law Workshop (XAILA2019@ICAIL) | + | 9: |
- | at the | + | |
- | [[https:// | + | |
- | June 17-21, 2019, Montréal (Qc.), Canada | + | |
+ | Session 1 | ||
- | Organizers: Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz, Paulo Novais | + | 9:30-10:00 |
+ | Barbara Gallina, Görkem Pacaci, David Johnson, Steve McKeever, Andreas Hamfelt, Stefania Costantini, Pierangelo Dell' | ||
- | ==== Workshop | + | 10: |
+ | Youssef Ennali | ||
+ | Data-driven AI development: | ||
- | Humanized AI (HAI) includes important perspectives in AI systems, including transparency and explainability (XAI). The idea of XAI has recently emerged as one of the most debated topics not only in the scientific community, but also in the general public. The design and use of AI algorithms raises important engineering, | + | 10:30-11:00 coffee break |
- | ==== Topics ==== | + | Session 2 |
+ | |||
+ | 11:00-12:00 INVITED TALK Philipp Hacker - AI and Discrimination: | ||
+ | |||
+ | 12: | ||
+ | Heng Zheng, Davide Grossi and Bart Verheij: | ||
+ | Precedent Comparison in the Precedent Model Formalism: Theory and Application to Legal Cases | ||
+ | |||
+ | 12: | ||
+ | Bernardo Alkmim, Edward Hermann Haeusler and Daniel Schwabe: | ||
+ | Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs in an Intuitionistic Description Logic | ||
+ | |||
+ | 13:00-14:00 lunch break | ||
+ | |||
+ | Session 3 | ||
+ | |||
+ | 14:00-15:00 INVITED TALK Reinoud Baker - Legal information systems in production | ||
+ | |||
+ | 15: | ||
+ | Annemarie Borg and Floris Bex: | ||
+ | Explaining Arguments at the Dutch National Police | ||
+ | |||
+ | 15:30-16:00 coffee break | ||
+ | |||
+ | Session 4 and Roundtable discussion | ||
+ | |||
+ | 16: | ||
+ | Łukasz Górski, Shashishekar Ramakrishna and Jędrzej M. Nowosielski: | ||
+ | |||
+ | 16: | ||
+ | Giovanni Sileno, Alexander Boer, Geoff Gordon and Bernhard Reader: Like Circles in the Water: Responsibility as a System-Level Function | ||
+ | |||
+ | 17: | ||
+ | Karl Branting: Explanation in Hybrid, Two-Stage Models of Legal Prediction | ||
+ | |||
+ | 17:30-18:15 Roundtable discussion and closing | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Invited Speakers ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | **Professor Dr. Philipp Hacker**, LL.M. (Yale), holds the Chair for Law and Ethics of the Digital Society at European University Viadrina in Frankfurt (Oder). He serves jointly at the Faculty of Law and at the European New School of Digital Studies (ENS). Before joining Viadrina, he was an AXA Postdoctoral Fellow at the Faculty of Law at Humboldt University of Berlin. Previous research stays include a Max Weber Fellowship at the European University Institute and an A.SK Fellowship at the WZB Berlin Social Science Center. His research focuses on law and technology as well as (behavioral) law and economics. In 2020, he received the Science Award of the German Foundation for Law and Computer Science. His most recent books include Regulating Blockchain. Techno-Social and Legal Challenges (Oxford University Press, 2019, co-edited with Ioannis Lianos, Georgios Dimitropoulos and Stefan Eich); Theories of Choice. The Social Science and the Law of Decision Making (Oxford University Press, forthcoming, | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Title of the talk** AI and Discrimination: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Abstract** | ||
+ | The talk will focus on the interaction between AI models and liability in the domain of non-discrimination. As is well-known, the output of AI models may exhibit bias toward legally protected groups. In the past, various fairness definitions have been developed to mitigate such discrimination. Against this background, the talk will first present a new model which allows AI developers to flexibly interpolate between different fairness definitions depending on the context of the model application. In the second step, however, the talk will inquire to what extent AI developers may risk liability under affirmative action doctrines if they seek to implement algorithmic fairness measures in their models. | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | **Reinoud Baker** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Title** Legal information systems in production | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Abstract** | ||
+ | LexIQ is a Dutch legal tech startup using data science for legal information services. We have the vision that legal tech can serve citizens, governments and businesses, for instance by improved access to justice, efficient use of resources and enhanced compliance. This talk will address what we have learned in the past 4 years. What can be achieved with modern software and algorithms? How can we make innovative technologies available for legal professionals and even the wider public? Which challenges are we encountering? | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Call for Papers ==== | ||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Motivation for the workshop ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the last several years we have observed a growing interest in advanced AI systems achieving impressive task performance. However, there has also been an increased awareness of their complexity and challenging consequences of their possibly limited understandability to humans. In response, a number of research directions have been initiated. These include humanized or human-centered AI, as well as ethically aligned, ethically designed, or just ethical AI. In many of these ideas, the principal concept seems to be the explanatory capability of the AI system (XAI), e.g. via interpretable and explainable machine learning, inclusion of human background knowledge and adequate declarative knowledge, that could provide foundations not only for transparency and understandability, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Recently, the term responsible AI (RAI) has been coined as a step beyond XAI. Discussion of RAI has been again strongly influenced by the “ethical” perspective. However, as practitioners in our fields we are convinced, that the advancements of AI are way too fast, and the ethical perspective much too vague to offer conclusive and constructive results. We are convinced, that the concepts of responsibility, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Topics | ||
+ | |||
+ | Our objective is to bring people from AI interested in XAI and RAI topics | ||
- | The scope of the XAILA workshop encompasses a broad array of topics including, but not limited to: | ||
* the notions of transparency, | * the notions of transparency, | ||
- | * non-functional design choices for explainable and transparent AI systems | + | * non-functional design choices for explainable and transparent AI systems |
* legal consequences of black-box AI systems | * legal consequences of black-box AI systems | ||
- | * legal criteria for explainable | + | * legal criteria |
+ | * criteria of legal responsibility discussed in the context of intelligent systems operation and the role of explainability in liability ascription | ||
* possible applications of XAI systems in the area of legal policy deliberation, | * possible applications of XAI systems in the area of legal policy deliberation, | ||
- | * ethical and legal implications of the use of AI systems in different spheres of societal life | + | * legal implications of the use of AI systems in different spheres of societal life |
* the notion of right to explanation | * the notion of right to explanation | ||
- | * relation of XAI and argumentation technologies | + | * relation of XAI and RAI to argumentation technologies |
- | * XAI models | + | * approaches |
+ | * XAI, RAI and declarative domain knowledge | ||
* risk-based approach to analysis of AI systems and the influence of XAI on risk assessment | * risk-based approach to analysis of AI systems and the influence of XAI on risk assessment | ||
- | * incorporating | + | * incorporation of ethical values into AI systems, its legal interpretation and consequences |
- | * XAI, privacy and data protection | + | * XAI, privacy and data protection |
- | * possible legal aspects | + | |
* XAI, certification and compliance | * XAI, certification and compliance | ||
- | ==== The intended audience | + | ==== Workshop format |
- | The workshop is of particular interest for the members of AI and Law community. However, it may also be found relevant by sociologists, | + | Workshop format: paper presentations + panel discussion, invited talk/s. |
- | ==== List of members of the program committee | + | Intended audience are practitioners and theorists from both law and AI. |
- | // | + | |
- | Martin Atzmueller, | + | ==== Program Committee ==== |
+ | |||
+ | List of members of the program committee | ||
+ | Martin Atzmueller, | ||
Michal Araszkiewicz, | Michal Araszkiewicz, | ||
Kevin Ashley, University of Pittsburgh, USA\\ | Kevin Ashley, University of Pittsburgh, USA\\ | ||
Line 56: | Line 129: | ||
David Camacho, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain\\ | David Camacho, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain\\ | ||
Pompeu Casanovas, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain\\ | Pompeu Casanovas, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain\\ | ||
- | Colette Cuijpers, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ | ||
- | Rafał Michalczak, Jagiellonian University, Poland\\ | ||
Teresa Moreira, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\ | Teresa Moreira, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\ | ||
Paulo Novais, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\ | Paulo Novais, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\ | ||
Line 64: | Line 135: | ||
Martijn von Otterlo, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ | Martijn von Otterlo, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ | ||
Adrian Paschke, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany\\ | Adrian Paschke, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany\\ | ||
- | Jose Palma, Univesidad de Murcia, Spain\\ | ||
Monica Palmirani, Università di Bologna, Italy\\ | Monica Palmirani, Università di Bologna, Italy\\ | ||
Radim Polčák, Masaryk University, Czech Republic\\ | Radim Polčák, Masaryk University, Czech Republic\\ | ||
Marie Postma, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ | Marie Postma, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ | ||
- | Juan Pavón, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Spain\\ | ||
Ken Satoh, National Institute of Informatics, | Ken Satoh, National Institute of Informatics, | ||
+ | Jaromír Šavelka, Carnegie Mellon University, USA\\ | ||
Erich Schweighofer, | Erich Schweighofer, | ||
- | Piotr Skrzypczyński, | + | Michal Valco, |
- | Dominik Ślęzak, Warsaw University, Poland\\ | + | Tomasz Żurek, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University of Lublin, Poland\\ |
- | Michal Valco, University | + | |
- | Tomasz Żurek, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University of Lublin, Poland | + | |
==== Important dates ==== | ==== Important dates ==== | ||
- | Submission: 26.04.2019\\ | + | Submission: //09.11.2020// <del>04.11.2020</ |
- | Notification: | + | Notification: |
- | Camera-ready: | + | Camera-ready: |
- | Workshop: | + | Workshop: |
+ | |||
+ | ==== Submission details ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | We accept regular/ | ||
+ | We also welcome short and position papers of 6pp. | ||
+ | Please use the [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | A dedicated Easychair installation is provided at [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Workshop proceedings will be made available by CEUR-WS. A post workshop journal publication is considered. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Past editions of XAILA ===== | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[start2018|The first edition, XAILA2018]] was | ||
+ | Organized by: Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz, | ||
+ | at the [[http:// | ||
+ | [[start2018|See the dedicated page for XAILA2018]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | XAILA 2018 proceedings can be found at [[http:// | ||
- | ==== Submission and proceedings ==== | + | We also proposed XAILA to be held on the [[https://icail2019-cyberjustice.com|International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (ICAIL)]], June 17-21, 2019, Montréal (Qc.), Canada. While the workshop was met with a large interest, and attracted many registered participants, |
- | Please submit using the dedicated Easychair installation | + | [[icail2019|See the dedicated page for XAILA2019@ICAIL]] |
- | [[https://easychair.org/ | + | |
- | We accept long (8 pages) and short/ | + | [[start2019|The second edition of XAILA, XAILA2019]] was Organized by: Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz, |
- | Please use the ACM format: | + | at the [[https://jurix2019.oeg-upm.net/|JURIX 2019 32nd International Conference on Legal Knowledge and Information Systems]] on the |
+ | December 11, 2019, Madrid, Spain in ETSI Minas y Energía School (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid) | ||
+ | [[start2019|See the dedicated page for XAILA2019]] | ||
- | Workshop | + | XAILA 2019 proceedings |
- | A post workshop journal publication is considered. | + | |