Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revisionPrevious revisionNext revision | Previous revisionNext revisionBoth sides next revision | ||
xaila:start [2018/12/06 13:13] – [Workshop Schedule] Bart abstract gjn | xaila:start [2021/06/19 09:22] – [Invited Speakers] gjn | ||
---|---|---|---|
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | ====== The EXplainable AI in Law (XAILA) | + | ====== The EXplainable |
- | **XAILA | + | **The main XAILA webpage |
+ | |||
+ | XAILA is an interdisciplinary workshop on the intersection of AI and Law, focusing on the important issues of EXplainable and Responsible AI. | ||
+ | |||
+ | In 2021 we are planning next editions of XAILA. | ||
+ | |||
+ | See more information on the [[start# | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== XAILA 2021 at ICAIL2021 ===== | ||
+ | The 4th International Workshop on // | ||
+ | at the [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | The idea of the XAILA series of JURIX workshops (1st edition XAILA 2018 in Groningen, 2nd edition XAILA 2019 in Madrid, 3rd edition XAILA 2020 in Brno (online)) is to provide an interdisciplinary platform for the discussion of ideas with respect to explainable AI, algorithmic transparency, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Organizing Commitee ==== | ||
+ | Michał Araszkiewicz, | ||
+ | Martin Atzmueller, University in Osnabrück, Germany\\ | ||
+ | Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Jagiellonian University in Kraków, Poland\\ | ||
+ | Bart Verheij, University in Groningen, the Netherlands\\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Call for Papers ==== | ||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Program ==== | ||
+ | **June 21 (Monday) Entirely online (the login information to Bluejeans provided via email). Furthermore we invite all participants to virtually meet in Gather.town. ** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **//All hours are in GMT//** | ||
+ | |||
+ | //Workshop starts// | ||
+ | |||
+ | * 15.30-15.45 – Opening (XAILA Chairs) | ||
+ | * 15.45-16.45 – [[start# | ||
+ | //Paper session 1// | ||
+ | |||
+ | * 16.45-17.15 – {{ : | ||
+ | }} | ||
+ | * 17.15-17.45 – {{ : | ||
+ | * 17.45-18.15 - {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | * 18.15-18.30 - break | ||
+ | * 18.30-19.20 – [[start# | ||
+ | |||
+ | //Paper session 2// | ||
+ | |||
+ | * 19.20 - 19.40 - {{ : | ||
+ | * 19.40-20.10 - {{ : | ||
+ | * 20.10-20.40 - roundtable discussion | ||
- | **Organized by:** Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz, | ||
- | at the [[http:// | ||
- | ===== Abstract ===== | + | ==== Description |
- | Humanized AI emphasizes transparency and explainability | + | In the last several years we have observed a growing interest |
- | ===== Motivation | + | Recently, the term responsible AI (RAI) has been coined as a step beyond XAI. Discussion of RAI has been again strongly influenced by the “ethical” perspective. However, as practitioners in our fields we are convinced that the advancements of AI are way too fast, and the ethical perspective much too vague to offer conclusive and constructive results. We are convinced that the concepts of responsibility, |
- | Humanized AI (HAI) includes important perspectives in AI systems, including transparency and explainability (XAI). Another one is the affective computing paradigm. These perspectives have an important ethical dimension. While ethical discussion is conducted by many philosophers, | + | ==== Topics |
- | We believe, that it is the intersection | + | Our objective is to bring people from AI interested in XAI and RAI topics |
- | Our objective is to bring people from AI interested in XAI/HAI topics (possibly with broader background than just engineering) | + | * the notions of transparency, |
- | * non-functional design choices for explainable and transparent AI systems | + | * non-functional design choices for explainable and transparent AI systems |
- | * legal requirements for AI systems in specific domains | + | |
* legal consequences of black-box AI systems | * legal consequences of black-box AI systems | ||
- | * legal criteria for explainable | + | * legal criteria |
+ | * criteria of legal responsibility discussed in the context of intelligent systems operation and the role of explainability in liability ascription | ||
* possible applications of XAI systems in the area of legal policy deliberation, | * possible applications of XAI systems in the area of legal policy deliberation, | ||
- | * ethical and legal implications of the use of AI systems in different spheres of societal life | + | * legal implications of the use of AI systems in different spheres of societal life |
- | * relation of XAI and argumentation technologies | + | * the notion of right to explanation |
- | * XAI models | + | * relation of XAI and RAI to argumentation technologies |
- | * understanding of the notions of explanation | + | * approaches and architectures for XAI and RAI in AI systems |
- | * risk-based approach to analysis of AI systems and the influence of XAI on risk assessment | + | * XAI, RAI and declarative domain knowledge |
- | * incorporating | + | * risk-based approach to analysis of AI systems and the influence of XAI on risk assessment |
- | * XAI, privacy and data protection | + | * incorporation of ethical values into AI systems, its legal interpretation and consequences |
- | * possible legal aspects | + | * XAI, privacy and data protection |
- | * legal requirements and risks in AI applications | + | |
* XAI, certification and compliance | * XAI, certification and compliance | ||
- | ===== Program committee ===== | + | ==== Important dates ==== |
+ | Submission: | ||
+ | Notification: | ||
+ | Camera-ready: | ||
+ | Workshop: 21.06.2021\\ | ||
- | Martin | + | ==== Submission details ==== |
- | Michal | + | We accept regular/ |
+ | A dedicated Easychair installation is provided at [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Program Committee (tbe & tbc) ==== | ||
+ | Martin | ||
+ | Michał | ||
Kevin Ashley, University of Pittsburgh, USA\\ | Kevin Ashley, University of Pittsburgh, USA\\ | ||
- | Szymon Bobek, | + | Floris Bex, Utrecht University, the Netherlands\\ |
+ | Szymon Bobek, | ||
Jörg Cassens, University of Hildesheim, Germany\\ | Jörg Cassens, University of Hildesheim, Germany\\ | ||
David Camacho, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain\\ | David Camacho, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain\\ | ||
Pompeu Casanovas, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain\\ | Pompeu Casanovas, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain\\ | ||
- | Colette Cuijpers, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ | + | Enrico Francesconi, IGSG-CNR, Italy\\ |
- | Rafał Michalczak, Jagiellonian University, Poland\\ | + | |
- | Teresa Moreira, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\ | + | |
Paulo Novais, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\ | Paulo Novais, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\ | ||
- | Grzegorz J. Nalepa, AGH University, Jagiellonian University, Poland\\ | + | Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Jagiellonian University, Poland\\ |
Tiago Oliveira, National Institute of Informatics, | Tiago Oliveira, National Institute of Informatics, | ||
Martijn von Otterlo, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ | Martijn von Otterlo, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ | ||
Adrian Paschke, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany\\ | Adrian Paschke, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany\\ | ||
- | Jose Palma, Univesidad | + | Juan Pavón, Universidad Complutense |
Monica Palmirani, Università di Bologna, Italy\\ | Monica Palmirani, Università di Bologna, Italy\\ | ||
Radim Polčák, Masaryk University, Czech Republic\\ | Radim Polčák, Masaryk University, Czech Republic\\ | ||
- | Marie Postma, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ | + | Víctor Rodríguez-Doncel, Universidad |
- | Juan Pavón, Universidad | + | |
Ken Satoh, National Institute of Informatics, | Ken Satoh, National Institute of Informatics, | ||
+ | Jaromír Šavelka, Carnegie Mellon University, USA\\ | ||
Erich Schweighofer, | Erich Schweighofer, | ||
- | Piotr Skrzypczyński, Poznań | + | Michal Valco, Constantine the Philosopher |
- | Dominik Ślęzak, Warsaw University, Poland\\ | + | Bart Verheij, University of Groningen, The Netherlands\\ |
- | Michal Valco, University of Presov, Slovakia\\ | + | Tomasz Żurek, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University of Lublin, Poland\\ |
- | Tomasz Żurek, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University of Lublin, Poland | + | |
- | ===== Important dates ===== | ||
- | * Submission: 23.< | + | ==== Invited Speakers ==== |
- | * Notification: | + | We are delighted that two excellent keynote speakers accepted our invitation to present their lectures at XAILA2011@ICAIL. They are: |
- | * Camera-ready: 07.12.< | + | |
- | * Workshop: | + | |
- | ===== Submission ===== | ||
- | Please submit using the dedicated Easychair installation [[https:// | ||
- | We accept long (8 pages) and short (4 pages) papers in PDF. | + | **Prof. Wojciech Wiewiórowski, |
- | Please use the [[http:// | + | |
- | |IOS Press format.]] | + | |
- | ===== Proceedings ===== | + | Bio: Adjunct professor in the Faculty of Law and Administration of the University of Gdańsk. He was among others adviser in the field of e-government and information society for the Minister of Interior and Administration, |
- | Workshop proceedings will be made available by CEUR-WS. | + | The Inspector General for the Protection of Personal Data (Polish Data Protection Commissioner) 2010-2014 and the Vice Chair of the Working Party Art. 29 in 2014. In December 2014, he was appointed Assistant European Data Protection Supervisor. After the death of the Supervisor - Giovanni Buttarelli in August 2019 - he replaced Mr. Buttarelli as acting EDPS. |
- | A post workshop journal publication is considered. | + | His areas of scientific activity include first of all Polish and European IT law, processing and security of information, |
- | ===== Call for papers ===== | + | **Prof. Katie Atkinson** |
- | {{ : | + | |
- | ===== Accepted papers ===== | + | Title: The Landscape and Challenges for Explainability in AI and Law |
- | Regular papers: | + | Bio: Katie Atkinson is Professor of Computer Science and Dean of the School of Electrical Engineering, Electronics |
- | * Jakub Harašta. //Trust by Discrimination: | + | |
- | * Giovanni Sileno, Alexander Boer and Tom Van Engers. //The Role of Normware | + | |
- | * Martijn Van Otterlo | + | |
- | * Michał Araszkiewicz and Grzegorz J. Nalepa. // | + | |
- | * Bernardo Alkmim, Edward Hermann Haeusler | + | |
- | * Muhammad Mudassar Yamin and Basel Katt. //Ethical Problems and Legal Issues | + | |
- | Short papers: | + | ===== XAILA 2020 at JURIX2020 ===== |
- | * Michał Araszkiewicz and Tomasz Zurek. //A Dialogical Framework for Disputed Issues in Legal Interpretation// | + | ==== Workshop Program ==== |
- | * Veronika Žolnerčíková. // | + | The workshop will take place on 09.12.2020 online using MSTeams. |
+ | More details will follow. | ||
- | ===== Workshop Schedule ===== | + | 9:15-9:30 Workshop Opening by the XAILA2020 Chairs |
- | 9.30-9.40 - **Introduction** | + | |
- | 9.40-10.10 - Jakub Harašta. Trust by Discrimination: | + | |
- | 10.10-10.40 - Giovanni Sileno, Alexander Boer and Tom Van Engers. The Role of Normware in Trustworthy and Explainable AI\\ | + | |
- | 10.40-11.00 - Michał Araszkiewicz | + | |
- | 11.00-11.30 - **Coffee break** | + | Session 1 |
- | 11.30-12.30 - **Keynote lecture: [[http:// | + | 9:30-10:00 |
- | Abstract: //AI's successes are these days so prominent that---if we believe reports in the news---the times seem near that machines perform better at any human task than humans themselves. At the same time the prominent AI technique of neural networks---today typically called deep learning---is often considered to lead to black box results, hindering transparency, explainability and responsibility, values that are central in the domain of law. So in that specific sense, the distance between neural network AI and the needs of the law is vast. In this talk, it is claimed that for good AI & Law we need an AI that can provide good answers to our questions, has good reasons for them and makes good choices. It is argued that the path towards good AI & Law requires the integration of data-driven | + | Barbara Gallina, Görkem Pacaci, David Johnson, Steve McKeever, Andreas Hamfelt, Stefania Costantini, Pierangelo Dell' |
- | Bio: // | + | 10:00-10:30 |
+ | Youssef Ennali and Tom van Engers: | ||
+ | Data-driven AI development: | ||
+ | |||
+ | 10:30-11:00 coffee break | ||
+ | |||
+ | Session 2 | ||
+ | |||
+ | 11:00-12:00 INVITED TALK Philipp Hacker - AI and Discrimination: | ||
+ | |||
+ | 12: | ||
+ | Heng Zheng, Davide Grossi and Bart Verheij: | ||
+ | Precedent Comparison in the Precedent Model Formalism: Theory | ||
+ | |||
+ | 12: | ||
+ | Bernardo Alkmim, Edward Hermann Haeusler and Daniel Schwabe: | ||
+ | Reasoning over Knowledge Graphs in an Intuitionistic Description Logic | ||
+ | |||
+ | 13:00-14:00 lunch break | ||
+ | |||
+ | Session 3 | ||
+ | |||
+ | 14:00-15:00 INVITED TALK Reinoud Baker - Legal information systems in production | ||
+ | |||
+ | 15: | ||
+ | Annemarie Borg and Floris Bex: | ||
+ | Explaining Arguments | ||
+ | |||
+ | 15:30-16:00 coffee break | ||
+ | |||
+ | Session 4 and Roundtable discussion | ||
+ | |||
+ | 16: | ||
+ | Łukasz Górski, Shashishekar Ramakrishna and Jędrzej M. Nowosielski: | ||
+ | |||
+ | 16: | ||
+ | Giovanni Sileno, Alexander Boer, Geoff Gordon and Bernhard Reader: Like Circles in the Water: Responsibility as a System-Level Function | ||
+ | |||
+ | 17: | ||
+ | Karl Branting: Explanation in Hybrid, Two-Stage Models | ||
+ | |||
+ | 17:30-18:15 Roundtable discussion and closing | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Invited Speakers ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | **Professor Dr. Philipp Hacker**, LL.M. (Yale), holds the Chair for Law and Ethics of the Digital Society at European University Viadrina in Frankfurt (Oder). He serves jointly at the Faculty | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Title of the talk** AI and Discrimination: | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Abstract** | ||
+ | The talk will focus on the interaction between AI models and liability | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{: | ||
+ | **Reinoud Baker** | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Title** Legal information systems in production | ||
+ | |||
+ | **Abstract** | ||
+ | LexIQ is a Dutch legal tech startup using data science for legal information services. We have the vision that legal tech can serve citizens, governments | ||
+ | |||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Call for Papers ==== | ||
+ | {{ : | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Motivation for the workshop ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the last several years we have observed a growing interest in advanced AI systems achieving impressive task performance. However, there has also been an increased awareness of their complexity and challenging consequences of their possibly limited understandability to humans. In response, a number of research directions have been initiated. These include humanized or human-centered AI, as well as ethically aligned, ethically designed, or just ethical AI. In many of these ideas, the principal concept seems to be the explanatory capability of the AI system (XAI), e.g. via interpretable and explainable machine learning, inclusion of human background knowledge and adequate declarative knowledge, that could provide foundations not only for transparency and understandability, | ||
+ | |||
+ | Recently, the term responsible AI (RAI) has been coined as a step beyond XAI. Discussion of RAI has been again strongly influenced by the “ethical” perspective. However, as practitioners in our fields we are convinced, that the advancements of AI are way too fast, and the ethical perspective much too vague to offer conclusive and constructive results. We are convinced, that the concepts of responsibility, | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Topics of interest ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Our objective is to bring people from AI interested in XAI and RAI topics | ||
+ | |||
+ | * the notions | ||
+ | * non-functional design choices for explainable and transparent AI systems | ||
+ | * legal consequences of black-box AI systems | ||
+ | * legal criteria and requirements for explainable, | ||
+ | * criteria of legal responsibility discussed in the context of intelligent systems operation and the role of explainability in liability ascription | ||
+ | * possible applications of XAI systems in the area of legal policy deliberation, | ||
+ | * legal implications of the use of AI systems in different spheres of societal life | ||
+ | * the notion of right to explanation | ||
+ | * relation of XAI and RAI to argumentation technologies | ||
+ | * approaches and architectures | ||
+ | * XAI, RAI and declarative domain knowledge | ||
+ | * risk-based approach to analysis of AI systems and the influence of XAI on risk assessment | ||
+ | * incorporation of ethical values into AI systems, its legal interpretation and consequences | ||
+ | * XAI, privacy and data protection | ||
+ | * XAI, certification and compliance | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Workshop format ==== | ||
+ | Workshop format: paper presentations + panel discussion, invited talk/s. | ||
+ | |||
+ | Intended audience are practitioners and theorists from both law and AI. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Program Committee ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | List of members of the program committee (to be confirmed): | ||
+ | Martin Atzmueller, Osnabrueck University, Germany\\ | ||
+ | Michal Araszkiewicz, | ||
+ | Kevin Ashley, University of Pittsburgh, USA\\ | ||
+ | Szymon Bobek, AGH University, Poland\\ | ||
+ | Jörg Cassens, University of Hildesheim, Germany\\ | ||
+ | David Camacho, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Spain\\ | ||
+ | Pompeu Casanovas, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Spain\\ | ||
+ | Teresa Moreira, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\ | ||
+ | Paulo Novais, University of Minho Braga, Portugal\\ | ||
+ | Grzegorz J. Nalepa, AGH University, Jagiellonian University, Poland\\ | ||
+ | Tiago Oliveira, National Institute of Informatics, | ||
+ | Martijn von Otterlo, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ | ||
+ | Adrian Paschke, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany\\ | ||
+ | Monica Palmirani, Università di Bologna, Italy\\ | ||
+ | Radim Polčák, Masaryk University, Czech Republic\\ | ||
+ | Marie Postma, Tilburg University, The Netherlands\\ | ||
+ | Ken Satoh, National Institute of Informatics, | ||
+ | Jaromír Šavelka, Carnegie Mellon University, USA\\ | ||
+ | Erich Schweighofer, | ||
+ | Michal Valco, Constantine the Philosopher University in Nitra, Slovakia\\ | ||
+ | Tomasz Żurek, Maria Curie-Skłodowska University of Lublin, Poland\\ | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Important dates ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | Submission: //09.11.2020// | ||
+ | Notification: | ||
+ | Camera-ready: | ||
+ | Workshop: | ||
+ | |||
+ | ==== Submission details ==== | ||
+ | |||
+ | We accept regular/ | ||
+ | We also welcome short and position papers of 6pp. | ||
+ | Please use the [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | A dedicated Easychair installation is provided at [[https:// | ||
+ | |||
+ | Workshop proceedings will be made available by CEUR-WS. A post workshop journal publication is considered. | ||
+ | |||
+ | ===== Past editions of XAILA ===== | ||
- | 12.30-13.00 - Michał Araszkiewicz and Grzegorz J. Nalepa. Explainability of Formal Models of Argumentation Applied to Legal Domain\\ | + | [[start2018|The first edition, XAILA2018]] was |
- | 13.00-14.00 - **Lunch** | + | Organized by: Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz, |
+ | at the [[http:// | ||
+ | [[start2018|See the dedicated page for XAILA2018]] | ||
+ | |||
+ | XAILA 2018 proceedings can be found at [[http:// | ||
- | 14.00-14.30 - | + | We also proposed XAILA to be held on the [[https:// |
- | \\ | + | [[icail2019|See the dedicated page for XAILA2019@ICAIL]] |
- | 14.30-15.00 - Muhammad Mudassar Yamin and Basel Katt. Ethical Problems and Legal Issues in Development and Usage Autonomous Adversaries in Cyber Domain | + | |
- | 15.00-15.30 - **Coffee break** | + | [[start2019|The second edition of XAILA, XAILA2019]] was Organized by: Grzegorz J. Nalepa, Martin Atzmueller, Michał Araszkiewicz, |
+ | at the [[https:// | ||
+ | December 11, 2019, Madrid, Spain in ETSI Minas y Energía School (Universidad Politécnica de Madrid) | ||
+ | [[start2019|See the dedicated page for XAILA2019]] | ||
- | 15.30-16.00 - Bernardo Alkmim, Edward Hermann Haeusler and Alexandre Rademaker. Utilizing iALC to Formalize the Brazilian OAB Exam\\ | + | XAILA 2019 proceedings can be found at [[http:// |
- | 16.00-16.20 - Veronika Žolnerčíková. Homologation of Autonomous Machines from a Legal Perspective\\ | + | |
- | 16.20-16:45 - **XAILA, closing & open discussion** | + | |